SC Rejects Review Petitions in Fake Bank Accounts Case. The Supreme Court petitioned Tuesday to review the January 7th order on its January 7th counterfeit bank account but explained that the court did not force the institutional seizure and could summon all enforcement agencies. Assistance for. At the hearing, the three judges of SC, consisting of Judge ASIF Said Kose, Faisal Arab Judge and Ijaz-UL Ahsan Judge, filed a petition asking the court to review the court's hearing on January 7.
SC Rejects Review Petitions in Fake Bank Accounts Case
Evidence from the Investigative Team (JIT) and fake account cases has been submitted to the State Department of Responsibility (NAB). The court determined the fate of all the petitions in a single hearing that lasted more than four hours, when the petitioner was upset over transferring the case from Karachi to Islamabad. Majeed of Asif Ali Zardari, his co-president of Pakistani People's Party, his sister Faryal Talpur, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, Sindh Government, Prime Minister Murad Ali Shah, Anver Majeed and Abdul Ghani Omni moved petitions and other applications. Group companies and others.
Asif Zardari, another petition against citing the JIT report, evidence against NAB. Candidate Sardar Latif Khosa, acting on behalf of Asif Zardari, appointed JIT and asked why he investigated allegations of fraudulent bank accounts of why other institutions were already investigating. "This is direct interference," he stressed. The Justice Minister explained that the court was not vulnerable when it was institutionalized and the court held that jurisdiction over former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in the case of a leak in the Panama paper. The enforcement authorities went forward to conduct a fair investigation.
A similar background is also possible in the present case
So the court had to intervene in the fake account," he said. If billions of Rupees are found here and there, someone has to investigate, and the Supreme Court has ordered those people to investigate the NAB problem. If this money does not belong to your customer, why are you worried?" The chief justice told the lawyer. Where is the disturbance?" Judge Ijaz-ul-Ahsan asked. He observed that the court ordered the JIT to act according to the law. Especially when the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) was convicted by the court that it lacked the ability or expertise to investigate white collar crime.
Adding that if the FIA is truly incompetent, there should be a controversy for the exercise of rhetorical power in accordance with Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, saying that it should be dissolved. We want to open a new avenue to determine the parameters of the rediscovery and reconsideration of the wheel," Ahsan Minister of Justice said. Their scope of jurisdiction was very limited in jurisdiction.
The advisory committee is not a preemptive attack, it is a preemptive attack, and it is not yet known whether a referral to a suspect will be brought before the NAB, "Judge Ahsan said. The lawyer then wondered if it was a pressure strategy against including the Inter-Services Intelligence (IJI) in the JIT. ISI is not under their responsibility, so ISI should not intervene in the civilian affairs, he added. "You are the custodian of the Constitution, and the government official insisted that you act strictly in accordance with the law.
When the Attorney General Ahsan emphasized that the Supreme Court could direct any agency or enforcement agency because it was subject to orders passed by the Supreme Court to all agencies or enforcement agencies, the Supreme Court's full judicial principle is also subject to Article 175 2) and 187 Constitution. When the court ordered the NAB to conduct an investigation in Islamabad instead of Karachi.
The chief justice reminded him that he had specific remedies under Article 16 (c) of the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO). Events from one city to another. Judge Ahsan regretted that the court had justified the jurisdiction of billions of rupees from the account kulfi wala and rehri walas. The lawyer argued that the complaint of the investigating agency could not be the basis for the investigation motive according to Article 184 (3) of the Constitution.
It was a simple witch hunt, but Judge Khosa insisted. But Ahsan judge did not
If there are two possible views and the court will adopt one of them, will it provide a basis for the review? The lawyer said JIT should be formulated in accordance with some laws, adding that the FIA and NAB are collecting customers in Islamabad through simultaneous investigations. He also criticized the media trial of the customer. Ahsan pointed out that when there are several transactions in excess of $ 39 billion in several subaccounts used to purchase Hundi and property, stocks and so on, the NAB should investigate the matter to investigate the case.
The lawyer argued that the NAB could not imagine the FIA being seized on the issue to refer the case to the NAB. Faryal Talpur's lawyer, Farooq H. Naek, can assert that certain orders of the January 7 order exceed the jurisdiction exercised under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution and that the approval of the JIT's actions is within the territory . Article 184 (3). He argued that JIT's research would be a priority for generations of his customers.
Shahid Hamid, representing Anah Majeed, added that the NAB chairman would ask the court to decide whether to refer the investigation to Karachi or Islamabad in accordance with the NAI, so that the event would meet the due process. NAB said that when the JIT was formed, there was no NAB, and when it was formed at the request of the FIA, the NIA's primary purpose was to support the FTA.
Sindh's adviser, Makhdoom Ali Khan, claimed that his client should have been heard by the JIT before speaking or recording anything on this case, but his client never received notice or summons. I did not.
Khalid Jawed Khan, who represents Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, insisted that if the case were transferred to Islamabad, he would go to the Islamabad High Court instead of the Sind High Court and seek remedies for a liability court or NAB order.
0 comments: